Canadians Should Thank Trump
He might get us off our butt, out of mediocrity and help us to start acting like adults.
If you believe in the importance of free speech, subscribe to support uncensored, fearless writing—the more people who pay, the more time I can devote to this. Free speech matters. I am a university professor suspended because of a free speech issue, so I am not speaking from the bleachers. The button below takes you to that story if you like.
Please subscribe to receive at least three pieces /essays per week with open comments. The cost is $5.75 per month, or about $4 USD. Everyone says, “Hey, it’s just a cup of coffee.”
(With me, it's not per day but just one per month).)
But if you’re like me, you go, “Hey, I only want so many cups of coffee!” I get it.
But I only ask that when you choose your coffee, please choose mine. Cheers.
In the great sweep of economic history, nations often stumble into their golden ages not through cautious deliberation but through necessity—spurred on by external shocks, existential threats, or the piercing clarity that a crisis brings.
Today, Canada stands at just such a crossroads. Donald Trump's tariff threats, crude and blustery as they may seem, present not just a challenge but an opportunity—an opportunity to break free from a decade of economic and cultural lassitude and embark upon a transformative journey not unlike that undertaken by Ireland during its storied ‘Celtic Tiger’ era.
Except we should do ours without the discouraging and curious new Irish indulgence in rank anti-semitism.
Our grandparents' generation spoke, “When God closes a door, he opens a window.” Let’s head for the Overton window, that hypothetical window of acceptable political options, crank it to the top, punch a wall next to it and put it in a bigger window.
For too long, Canada has been content to muddle along in mediocrity, buoyed by its resource wealth, proximity to the United States, a seemingly infinite supply of self-congratulation, overweening pride at not being American and the occasional gold hockey medal at the Olympics.
But behind the polite facade lies stagnation: supply management systems strangling free markets, interprovincial trade barriers reducing a nation to a fragmented confederation of economic fiefdoms, and fiscal policies that seem blithely unaware of the looming debt trap. The time has come for Canada to abandon this complacency and pursue bold reform—a path that Ireland once blazed and that Canada could now follow.
Under the bold leadership phenomenon, there is a concept called preference revelation. It occurs when people are unsure or divided about what they want until a leader articulates a bold, clear vision or takes decisive action that resonates with them on a deeper level.
It reflects a latent demand, like when marketers bring us products we didn’t know we wanted until we saw them. Voters may not realise they want transformative change until a bold leader presents it.
Right now, Canada is still prone to catering to vocal minorities, and I have seen no evidence that Pollievre will create meaningful political change and, from that, cultural transformation. If things continue, the average Canadian will earn 50% of the average American’s salary in 2050.
We must start by looking at our enormous natural resources, oil and gas, minerals and tremendous agri-business with pride as natural advantages to leverage and be proud of.
(Fun fact: our agri-businesses are larger than Ontario and Quebec-based auto and airline businesses, but guess who gets all the federal grift?).
The madness of putting an environmentalist wackjob, an admitted socialist, in as Environment Minister just to poke a finger in the eye of Alberta reeks of grade school politics and immaturity. No, we cannot ride our bikes through blizzards in -20 C. Steven Guilbealt might try, but he is a very strange man.
Are we good with that?
Let’s hope the Conservatives are bold, but now it’s just marketing and grandstanding.
Is the electorate open to bold leadership? Do we have politicians who can stand strong, even when squeaky wheels moan, and the party’s polling numbers start falling?
The Celtic Tiger and others: A Model for Canadian Renewal
My grandmother left Kerrykeel, Ireland, with her family in the early 20th century; Canada offered hope, and Ireland offered little more than unfair sharecropping arrangements with English landlords.
Even into the late 20th century, Ireland was not unlike Canada today—a small, open economy with abundant potential that was weighed down by protectionism, fiscal profligacy, and an overreliance on government largesse.
Yet, Ireland made a bold choice. It slashed corporate tax rates to among the lowest in Europe, embraced foreign direct investment with open arms, invested heavily in education, and built a regulatory environment to attract global business giants.
Do you think nobody in Ireland was screaming bloody murder and saying such change would be the ruination of Ireland?
But the result? A nation that transformed itself from Europe’s poorhouse to one of the continent’s most dynamic economies. Pollsters say Canadians are increasingly pessimistic, our federal government and prime minister seem disconnected from reality, and the public is hungry for meaningful change.
Through bold reforms, Estonia became a global digital leader, embracing e-governance and digital infrastructure. In the 1990s, after gaining independence, Estonia prioritized internet access and technology education. They implemented an e-residency program, allowing global citizens to start businesses remotely, and developed advanced cybersecurity systems.
Nearly all public services, including voting, healthcare, and taxes, are accessible online. Estonia’s commitment to digital innovation modernised the country and positioned it as a model for e-democracy worldwide.
Do you think they had no squeaky wheels moaning, “It won’t work?”
But we have been here before; every election is the most important ever. Assuming the Conservatives get in, do they have the courage to ignore the polling data on every decision, a strategy that guarantees bold campaigning and the same bland tofu Canadian diet of political governance?
As Milton Friedman once observed, “The most important central fact about a free market is that no exchange takes place unless both parties benefit.” Ireland understood this truth, and Canada must now do the same. Relying on outdated protectionist policies or patchwork fiscal strategies is not enough. Canada must take decisive steps toward meaningful structural reform.
Slaying Sacred Cows: Supply Management and Beyond
At the heart of Canada’s economic sclerosis lies supply management, a grotesque policy relic that drives up consumer prices, limits trade flexibility, and serves as an albatross in trade negotiations. Adam Smith famously said in The Wealth of Nations, “People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public or in some contrivance to raise prices.”
Canada’s dairy and poultry industries are textbook examples of a conspiracy against the public interest. The time has come to dismantle this system, not timidly or piecemeal, but with conviction and clarity. If Ireland could tear down its barriers to international investment, surely Canada can reform an outdated policy that serves the few at the expense of the many.
In 2001, the average extra cost to families due to supply management was $444. Today, it is $1277 per family in pretax dollars. A recent study estimates that approximately 7% of Canada’s milk production has been discarded over the past decade due to overproduction and lack of demand.
This rate is notably higher than in other countries, such as the United States (up to 0.5%), Sweden (0.3%), and France (3.5%). The study, led by Dr Sylvain Charlebois of Dalhousie University, estimates that between 6.8 billion and 10 billion litres of milk were discarded in Canada from 2012 to 2021, valued at up to $14.9 billion.
Are we all good with this? The Conservatives are as afraid of changing this as the NDP and the Liberals.
Will we just say, “Okay, sorry?”
Internal Trade: A House Divided Against Itself
It is sad and ironic that Canadian businesses often find it easier to trade with their American neighbours than with fellow Canadians in another province. Interprovincial trade barriers have persisted for decades, creating inefficiencies and stifling growth. In a modern economy, such internal blockades are absurd. John A. Macdonald’s dream of a transcontinental economic union remains unfulfilled.
As former Bank of Canada Governor Stephen Poloz once said, “If we want our economy to fire on all cylinders, we cannot afford to have barriers between those cylinders.” Canada must move decisively to tear down these internal walls. An economy cannot thrive when its provinces are economically estranged.
Tax Competitiveness: Lessons from the Emerald Isle
One of Ireland’s most profound reforms was its radical corporate tax policy. By cutting corporate taxes to attract global investment, Ireland became a magnet for international businesses, including tech giants and financial firms. Canada, on the other hand, has allowed its corporate tax structure to drift into mediocrity.
As economist Arthur Laffer observed, “You cannot tax an economy into prosperity.” Yet Canada persists in viewing corporate success as a trough to be raided. The Liberals and the NDP demonize productive, hardworking, successful workers. This is divisive and foolish, pushing us down the road to poverty.
The country must emulate Ireland’s boldness and design a tax structure that rewards investment and innovation rather than punishes them. Lower corporate taxes are not corporate welfare—they recognise that wealth is created by those willing to risk capital, not those who redistribute it.
Policing and Social Order: No More Timidity
Canada’s public order is fraying, and the federal government has displayed an astonishing lack of resolve in addressing it. What purport to be protests against Israel have all too often descended into pro-Hamas intimidation, ethnic unrest, and outright violence. Attacks on schools, synagogues, and against Jewish school buses have escalated.
Yet, the response from Ottawa has been feeble—a mosaic of platitudes, nervous equivocating, and an unwillingness to draw a firm line.
Law enforcement is primarily a provincial responsibility, but the federal government has a moral and political duty to set the tone. As Edmund Burke warned, “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.” There must be a clear, national stance: violence and intimidation will be met with swift and forceful enforcement of the law.
The revolving door of ‘catch and release’ policies, enabled by Trudeau-appointed judges steeped in soft progressive ideology, must end. Because of misguided compassion or partisan judicial appointments, Canada cannot allow its cities to be lawless.
Immigration: A Nation, Not a Hotel
Canada has long prided itself on being an open, welcoming nation—a stance that, at its best, reflects the finest traditions of hospitality and inclusivity. However, the immigration system has descended into chaos. It must be reined in, not out of cruelty but out of a profound respect for what Canada represents.
Integration is not optional. Diversity, far from being an unexamined strength, must be paired with a shared set of national values. Those values include gender equality, secular public spaces, and respect for Canadian customs.
I was in a cancer ward with my mother-in-law when a Muslim woman demanded of the nurse that the ward be emptied of men because it made her feel uncomfortable. The nurse held firm, and I wasn’t moving.
As Theodore Roosevelt said, “The one absolute way of bringing this nation to ruin… would be to permit it to become a tangle of squabbling nationalities.” Canada must reject the notion that it is a nervous hotel keeper catering to every demand of transient guests. Instead, it must project confidence: “This is Canada. We are fair and free, but we are not infinitely malleable.”
National Stoutness: The Return of Canadian Pride
Trudeau’s persistent self-flagellation—posing as humility but, in truth, offering little more than performative shame—has become unCanadian. Apologies have their place, but endless apologies erode national dignity. Canada must rediscover its stoutness—its ability to stand firm, project confidence, and act purposefully.
This moment demands bold action rather than nervousness or endless self-recrimination. Canada must rise from the kiddie table of global economics and politics and declare its readiness to compete, innovate, and defend its interests with clarity and courage.
The Celtic Tiger moment is within reach—but only if Canada chooses boldness over timidity, courage over platitude, and action over inertia. History beckons and Canada must not falter. It is our time. Let’s not get fooled by clever political marketing; let 2025 be the year that other countries look and say, “Look what Canada has done; they got rid of the dingbat who shows off his socks at world conferences and finally made substantial bold changes.”
If you believe in the importance of free speech, subscribe to support uncensored, fearless writing—the more people who pay, the more time I can devote to this. Free speech matters. I am a university professor suspended because of a free speech issue, so I am not speaking from the bleachers. The button below takes you to that story if you like.
Please subscribe to receive at least three pieces /essays per week with open comments. It’s $5.75 per month, or about $4 USD. Everyone says, “Hey, it’s just a cup of coffee.” (With me, it's not per day but just one per month.) But if you’re like me, you go, “Hey, I only want so many cups of coffee!” I get it.
I don’t subscribe to many here because I can’t afford it.
But I only ask that when you choose your coffee, please choose mine. Cheers.
Well said, Paul. The time for bland leadership is past. Great ideas for making that happen.