FREE IMRAN KHAN!

The Lion in Chains: Imran Khan and the Art of Manufactured Justice

If you’ve made it this far in life without being fired, cancelled, or publicly flogged for saying something true, congratulations — you’re ahead of me. I write because I can’t not; because silence feels like complicity, and complicity feels like rot. If this piece leaves you nodding, snarling, or muttering, “Well, he’s not wrong,” then you’re precisely the reader I’m writing for.

You’ll get two essays a week — unapologetically long, occasionally bleak, often funny, always honest. It’s six bucks a month — less than one coffee in Carney’s Canada, or two if you buy the cheap stuff. Everyone says that, of course: “It’s just a cup of coffee.” Fine. But if you’re only going to buy one cup this month, make it mine. It’s $6 a month, and you can cancel anytime.

A lone man sits in Cell 804 of Adiala Jail in Rawalpindi, Pakistan—the concrete sweats. The air is heavy, unmoving. For twenty-two hours a day, the electricity is cut, turning the small chamber into a kiln where the heat presses down like an iron hand. The water—his water, the little he is given—is murky, contaminated, “unfit for any human being,” as he has written.

His books have been confiscated, his newspapers withheld, his visitors barred despite court orders. Even his sons, living in London, are denied weekly calls. His medical examinations—hearing loss, tinnitus, vertigo—were ignored.

He is kept in a death cell, ordinarily reserved for terrorists, in solitary confinement as a tool of political instruction.

This is not a man serving a criminal sentence. This is a man the state is trying to break.

And the man is Imran Khan.

Let us begin in the only place that matters this is a justice issue, not a religious one. It does not matter whether Imran Khan is Muslim, Christian, Hindu, Sikh, an atheist, or a devout worshipper of his own reflection.

No human being should be denied due process, and when a state imprisons someone because he threatens entrenched power, the matter ceases to be political and becomes moral. If the law becomes a convenience for the powerful, then it is no longer the law but a velvet-wrapped bludgeon masquerading as justice.

And so we arrive at the lion in his cage, a man whose life has been so improbable and exasperatingly charmed that even his detractors cannot detach the sneer from the stare.

Long before he was a politician, he was the only Pakistani export that required no apology. While the nation lurched between coups, corruption, military interventions, and existential dread, Khan strode across the cricket world like a warrior-prince with a PhD in reverse swing.

For two decades, he was Pakistan’s athletic demigod—fast-bowling, leonine, uncomfortably handsome, and carrying the burdens of a hopeful nation with the casual ease of a man lifting a teacup.

Then came 1992, when he led Pakistan to its first and only Cricket World Cup victory. It was not so much a sports triumph as a national hallucination of possibility—a brief moment when Pakistanis breathed deeper, stood taller, and glimpsed a country that was not perpetually on fire.

And then London: the nightlife, the aristocracy, the tabloids calling him a playboy (their prudish word for “infuriatingly attractive man whose social life we resent”).

He drifted through that world with the kind of grace only possessed by those who have never doubted their own magnetism. Any other man’s biography would have ended there, on a yacht, with a champagne flute and a memoir ghostwritten by someone from Oxford.

But Khan committed a far graver sin: he grew up.

The playboy dissolved, and the philanthropist emerged. He built hospitals for the poor, founded the PTI in 1996 when no one took him seriously, and became the reluctant moralist of a country that prefers its politics to be feudal, corrupt, and comfortably predictable.

By 2018, he was prime minister—elected not by feudal dynasties nor military orchestration, but by millions who believed, perhaps naively, that the future could be unshackled from the past. This, of course, was intolerable. Because in Pakistan, political power is not owned. It is rented. And the military landlord lives in Rawalpindi, wearing stars on his shoulders.

Khan’s independence, his volcanic popularity, his refusal to kneel—these were his real crimes. What followed was the standard choreography of a state that has perfected the art of self-sabotage. The no-confidence vote toppled him.

Then came the deluge: more than 150 cases ranging from merely implausible to hallucinatory. His marriage was put on trial. His speeches became evidence. Courts that normally move with the speed and urgency of an archaeological dig suddenly moved like caffeinated interns.

And now—Cell 408. Solitary confinement. Death cell.

Court orders allowing visits are ignored. His wife has been denied meetings twice. His sons were threatened with arrest. A contempt petition was filed. And the jail authorities, in their infinite compassion, keep him drenched in sweat, weakened, mentally tortured— “so he will break,” as his aides put it.

Doctors report bilateral tinnitus. Sensorineural hearing loss. Vertigo. All untreated.

This is not justice. This is a slow, meticulous attempt at erasure.

And yet, what is striking is not the cruelty—cruelty is cheap and widely available—but the political intent behind it.

Khan is not being punished for corruption; he is being punished for possibility. He represents a version of Pakistan that is not owned by its dynasties or controlled by its generals. His imprisonment is less a legal outcome than a preventative measure.

His guilt or innocence is not the point. The pattern is. The timing is. The machinery is.

What matters is whether a state that claims to be democratic can silence its opposition with this level of vengeful efficiency. What matters is whether a nation can survive when law becomes a weapon rather than a shield. What matters is that injustice anywhere, to anyone—under any flag or faith—should rouse the conscience of all who claim to value dignity.

Imran Khan’s story is not that of a Muslim leader persecuted for his faith. It is the story of a man—flawed, brilliant, maddening, lion-hearted—caught in the gears of a historical machine that devours anyone who threatens its custodians. And if a state can silence a man like him, it can silence anyone.

That is why this saga matters. Not because of Pakistan’s tribal neuroses or sectarian anxieties, but because justice must belong to everyone, or it belongs to no one at all.

The solitary man in Cell 804 is not merely a prisoner. He is a test.

A test for Pakistan. A test for those who claim to defend democracy.

A test for all of us who believe, however naively, that truth still has the right to speak through the bars. And for now, the bars remain shut.

But the world is watching.

And history, that stubborn old magistrate, is taking notes.

Note: My ex-students Haider and Moe, fine entrepreneurial fellows, are selling Free Imran Khan caps; see the picture below.

I worked together on the design with Haider.

If you are interested in a bulk order, or just one, the caps can be purchased for $40 Canadian each (tax included). Shipping would have to be arranged, or they can be picked up in person if you live in the Toronto/Mississauga area.

Moe’s Number is +1 (437) 318-7872

Haider’s WhatsApp/Phone number is 647 745 4205.

If you found value in this article and wish to support my ongoing work, please consider leaving a tip. Your support helps me continue producing uncensored content on critical issues.

---