Lately I’ve noticed something strange: you can publish a widely read Substack piece, name institutions, cite evidence, break real news — and Google acts like none of it ever happened.
I like the stack because it’s where everyone one went that got canceled went it the redoubts the George Washington spoke of . It is an open system hidden from the matrix
Is there something about Substack that makes it harder to share links to the content? I agree it is a shame that search engines are not able to increase the readership of the fabulous articles found there.
There are pros and cons to this argument. However, there is so much valuable information, facts, analysis, ideas in SUBSTACK by writers, journalists, historians etc. that MSM can never even begin to approximate that leaving it out is a huge mistake.
Many, many writers are on Substack BECAUSE they were scrubbed / cancelled / banned/ nuked / pulverized or de-emphasized by Google and it's subsidiaries.
So if somebody has a way to outsmart Google's algorithm, that would be amazing.
Yes. It's true. I solved this problem by using my personal website as my seo-optimized site where I publish shorter versions of my substack articles and then refer readers to substack who want the more in-depth versions
I like the stack because it’s where everyone one went that got canceled went it the redoubts the George Washington spoke of . It is an open system hidden from the matrix
Is there something about Substack that makes it harder to share links to the content? I agree it is a shame that search engines are not able to increase the readership of the fabulous articles found there.
Substack's links are often longer than the actual article. It's probably best to run them through bit.ly first.
There are pros and cons to this argument. However, there is so much valuable information, facts, analysis, ideas in SUBSTACK by writers, journalists, historians etc. that MSM can never even begin to approximate that leaving it out is a huge mistake.
You made a good point LMS.
Many, many writers are on Substack BECAUSE they were scrubbed / cancelled / banned/ nuked / pulverized or de-emphasized by Google and it's subsidiaries.
So if somebody has a way to outsmart Google's algorithm, that would be amazing.
I wouldn't hold my breath, though.
Yes. It's true. I solved this problem by using my personal website as my seo-optimized site where I publish shorter versions of my substack articles and then refer readers to substack who want the more in-depth versions